Demo: fictional platforms, sample data.Request pilot access

Models & Features

Which chat, image and video models competitors run, and what each feature delivers.

Model comparisons for 5 platforms from paid runs; feature status for all 14 tested platforms.

Partial data

Chat models

Your platform: same scene in every model

House v32.4 s6.1 s160L4incl.
House v3 Thinking4.9 s11.8 s310L41

2 rows · click a column to sort

Image and video models

Your platform

ImagePhoto v2185face kept
ImageAnime124face lost
VideoClip 5 s5100silent

3 rows · click a column to sort

Model inventory across the panel

Every model our tests have seen; measured values where a ladder ran · sources: model ladder, limits protocol, cost ledger, models.json

Your platform · 0 modelsCompetitor A · 0 modelsCompetitor B · 0 modelsCompetitor C · 0 modelsCompetitor D · 0 modelsCompetitor E · 0 modelsCompetitor F · 0 modelsCompetitor G · 0 modelsCompetitor H · 0 models

0 rows · click a column to sort

Feature map

Score where offered · – not offered · blank untested

Your platform3.0––3.04.33.5–3.0–
Competitor A4.04.5–4.04.54.5–4.0–
Competitor B5.05.0–5.03.54.5––2.0
Competitor C2.8–––3.04.04.0––
Competitor D2.03.0–3.52.5––––
Competitor E4.03.5––4.01.0–––
Competitor F1.01.52.0–2.52.0––2.0
Competitor G–––3.03.5––3.0–
Competitor H––––4.0––––

9 rows · click a column to sort

Settings we found

Your platform

Chat model
Two models: House v3 (default) and a Thinking model at 1 credit per message
Memory
Automatic per chat, pinned memories